逻辑 Critical Reasoning-17489

标记
In a certain socialist country, party members earn twice as much as non-party members do. But party members happen to work in the businesses that generally have higher wages. Non-party members who also work in these particular businesses earn about as much as party members. Therefore, higher incomes do not necessarily result from the connection with the party.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

【选项】Non-party members in a given industry often receive higher wage as a result of the lobbying done by party members, which in turn increases the wage for the entire industry.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

jeffvan 2016-06-05 21:33:32

个人觉得,原文结论句说的是,the higher incomes of these particular businesses do not necessarily result from the connection with the party. 如果是这样,该选项就很好理解了,无党派认识的高收入是因为党派成员的游说,使得整体行业的薪资水平提升。很明显的削弱了原文结论。

0个赞

MEDOU 2016-11-02 21:13:54

由于党员游说,非党员收入较高工资,也提高了整个行业的工资水平。这个选项中将党员和非党员区分的很开,也涉及到了高工资,说明了高工资是党员游说的结果。weaken,正确。(实际上解释了为什么在同一个business非党员和党员的工资可以一样高——工资一样高的原因就是党员的游说,而这个原因又与party有很强的connection)

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们