逻辑 Critical Reasoning-17486

标记
In a certain socialist country, party members earn twice as much as non-party members do. But party members happen to work in the businesses that generally have higher wages. Non-party members who also work in these particular businesses earn about as much as party members. Therefore, higher incomes do not necessarily result from the connection with the party.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

【选项】Besides wage increases, party members also receive other benefits.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

菜饼饼托福要加油 2015-10-25 19:10:23

原文说的是政党和income的关系,和other benefit无关。weaken的是income和政党的关系。

0个赞

菜饼饼托福要加油 2015-10-25 19:10:24

原文说的是政党和income的关系,和other benefit无关。weaken的是income和政党的关系。

0个赞

jeffvan 2016-06-05 21:28:32

该选项是一个很好的迷惑项。说除了薪酬增长外,还有外快。但是无党派人士是不是有呢?这个选项如果成立必须是基于无党派人士只有死工资,没有任何额外收入的基础上。但该选项显然无法给出。错误。

0个赞

MEDOU 2016-11-02 21:04:37

benefits 与income 无关,更与party无关。文章讨论的是income与party之间的关系,结论是higher income与party无关,问削弱,要找证明higher income与party有关的。

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们