you can't say "born under it"; this would imply babies that were born when THEY were under the age of thirty. this is clearly not what we mean. B补全之后是"more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than babies born under the age of thirty“。 正解(A)补全之后是"more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than babies born to women under the age of thirty"。 考虑平行结构或者比较结构的重复哪些可以省略哪些不可以省略的时候,唯一的标准就是会不会影响语义。这里既然省略掉born也不会影响语义,那么应该遵循economical原则,选最简洁的表达。
than (babies were) born under the age of 30, 缺少 to women
B补全之后是"more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than babies born under the age of thirty“。 than (babies were) born under the age of 30, 缺少 to women
you can't say "born under it"; this would imply babies that were born when THEY were under the age of thirty. this is clearly not what we mean. B补全之后是"more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than babies born under the age of thirty“。 正解(A)补全之后是"more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than babies born to women under the age of thirty"。 考虑平行结构或者比较结构的重复哪些可以省略哪些不可以省略的时候,唯一的标准就是会不会影响语义。这里既然省略掉born也不会影响语义,那么应该遵循economical原则,选最简洁的表达。
B. under it修饰了born,逻辑意思荒谬。
than (babies were) born under the age of 30, 缺少 to women,且born under it主语可以变成baby,歧义。
under it 修饰born ,逻辑错误
变成了小孩under 40 应该是babies were born to women under it
主语比较: A do sth than B do.(AB为对等名词,加do是为了显示这是一个可以发出动作的名词,因 而确定是主语,进而确定是主语对比) 介宾比较: A do sth of C1 by D1 than of C2 by D2.(C1C2,D1D2对等名词) 宾语比较: A do C1 than C2.(C1C2为对等名词) 状语比较: A do sth than usual/everbefore/people expected(直接加状语)
born under it主语可以变成baby,歧义
省掉born不影响句子意思,因此全省掉;且加上born反而会产生歧义
born under it主语变成baby, 正确的逻辑主语应该是women
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习