#倒装 独立主格 平行# 独立结构:名/代+形/副/介/分/不定式 So dogged were Frances Perkins' investigations of the garment industry{, so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform, }that Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt recruited Perkins to work within the government, rather than as a social worker. So..that..是个很完美的结构, so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform前面的and去掉了,说明并不是与前面的So dogged were Frances Perkins' investigations of the garment industry做并列成分,而是做从属伴随成分(独立主格),是So dogged…的详细说明.但同时因为两者都是recruited Perkins的原因,所以应该用相同结构。 C里面也是独立主格,伴随修饰前半个分句,错误的原因就在于并没有表示出her lobbying for wage and hour reform persistent也是recruited的原因之一。即便是分句,后面有了that,那么so that结构应该完整。
这里是两个so引导的句子和that搭配,但是第二个so里面没有谓语动词,是独立主格结构,如果要有动词,那么应该在so前面加上连词,从而形成两个并列的结构。
看得出是考so...that.就可以做对。
so adj. ,so adj.平行
这里加and反而不对了,因为and连接的是两个句子,但是后面的部分并不是一个完整的句子; C里面也是独立主格,伴随修饰前半个分句,错误的原因就在于并没有表示出her lobbying for wage and hour reform persistent也是recruited的原因之一。即便是分句,后面有了that,那么so that结构应该完整。
这里加and反而不对了,因为and连接的是两个句子,但是后面的部分并不是一个完整的句子; C里面也是独立主格,伴随修饰前半个分句,错误的原因就在于并没有表示出her lobbying for wage and hour reform persistent也是recruited的原因之一。即便是分句,后面有了that,那么so that结构应该完整。
So persistent 放在句首, 而不像so dogged were一样有个谓语动词, 就证明了, 这是一个独立主格, 并列句没有省略连词的. 划线部分与前面so…industry平行。
so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform前面的and去掉了,说明并不是与前面的So dogged were Frances Perkins' investigations of the garment industry做并列成分,而是做从属伴随成分(独立主格),是So dogged…的详细说明
so persistent her lobbying for wage and hr reform 没有and,没有be 因为这是一个独立主格结构,进一步详细展开描述so dogged... 但为了显示这二者都是that AES and FDR... 的原因,所以用了尽量平行的结构。这也是为什么C不如这个选项。
没有用and连接前句,说明两者结构上不是平行关系,不是完整句子,而是独立主格,和前句一起解释后句。
首先要看到so that结构,直接排除ABD,在CE中间选,而E明显比C要好。
so...that 结构要完整,只剩C&E。E与前句结构上更平行,从而表明AES and FDR recruit FP 是两个原因investigation dogged,lobby persistent。句子结构也更工整。
You are correct that "So X...That Y" is idiomatic. Thus, "So dogged were her investigations" requires a "that" prior to "Alfred Smith and Franklin Roosevelt." Eliminate A and D. To me, your second question more concerns parallelism than strictly idiomatic construction. The two initial clauses in the sentence are comparable sentence components and thus must be presented in a manner that is structurally similar. The only choice that does so is answer choice E: "so dogged/ so persistent" is correct. Choice C, by removing the second "so," lacks proper parallelism. As for your final question, her lobbying and Frances Perkins' lobbying are equivalent. The use of the possessive pronoun "her" simply makes the sentence less unwieldy and less repetitive.
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习