Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.
这句句子不是递进关系,不能掉进not only… but also… 的陷阱里面
前面说的是肯定,后面说的是否定,属于转折关系;not only but also 说的是递进,要么都是肯定,要么都是否定;which 就近修饰farmland不对
Which定语从句修饰farmland,逻辑意义错误,是systematic clearing给了consumers houses and furniture,不是farmland。
前正后负明显不能用不仅....而且....该词组是同方向性的
是SCF提供了便宜的住房和家具,不是farmland,一定要从语义判断!!前面说的是肯定,后面说的是否定,属于转折关系;not only but also 说的是递进,要么都是肯定,要么都是否定
Which定语从句修饰farmland,逻辑意义错误,是systematic clearing给了consumers houses and furniture,不是farmland。
not only.... but also 兩者之間的方向是要一致
逻辑为王: 如果你一眼看出这个句子考not only,but also于是开始找答案有风险 两个句子不是平行的
逻辑为王,这道题这两个层次并不是平行的,而是强调后面的不好结果
Which定语从句修饰farmland,逻辑意义错误,是systematic clearing给了consumers houses and furniture,不是farmland。
本句明显的转折关系 而不是递进关系 不是farmland给了宝贵的房子和家具(??)而是clearing这个行动给了 所以which就近指代肯定是错的
前面说的是肯定,后面说的是否定,属于转折关系;not only but also 说的是递进,要么都是肯定,要么都是否定;which 就近修饰farmland不对
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习