view sth as 正确 now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation,典型的独立现在分词结构作状语,在从句里修饰整个从句,这里可以把它作为原因状语,viewing与逻辑主语policy makers相一致。 所以,稍微分析下句子结构就不会有“修饰前面Many financial experts believe....的歧义”这种奇怪的想法了。
That kind of modifier must describe the subject+action. If it's not related to the action, it's incorrect. E.g., Marcus dropped the groceries onto the floor, scaring the dog. --> "Scaring the dog" describes the entire subject+action, "Marcus dropped the groceries onto the floor". Correct. Marcus dropped the groceries onto the floor, standing about 6 feet tall. --> Even if Marcus is about 6 feet tall, this sentence is still incorrect. There's no relationship between his height and the action of dropping the groceries. If you wanted to write this sentence (I can't imagine why you would), you'd have to put the modifier on "Marcus": Marcus, who stands about 6 feet tall, dropped the groceries onto the floor. Of course, comma+ing must actually follow a clause to have this function. If it doesn't -- if it follows only a noun (maybe with modifiers), but not an action -- then it just modifies the noun. The driver of the sedan, looking down at his phone, didn't see the cat running into the road.
policy maker认为现在经济不错(保持在适度的增长和低通胀之间),所以会在可预见的未来保持不变的利率。所以be certain是现在的动作。for the foreseeable future并不代表动作发生在未来
,now viewing 修饰的是policy makers,are是句子的谓语,从句主谓宾完整,between and 搭配正确
B:policy maker缺谓语 C:policy makers缺谓语动词;who做限定性修饰使得语义上不合理。 D:view sth as sth;between that of中的that无所指;will be时态错误,be certain是发生在现在的动作。 E:view sth as sth.;which就近修饰Reserve语意错误; is 应该改为are, 因为policy makers 是主语 注意当选项出现between A & B 和 between that of A&B时去考虑一下这个that of中的that的是不是无指代
viewing在从句中做伴随状语修饰从句中的主语--policy makers非常清楚
view...as... comma+ing在句中是否夹心修饰 要看位置,如在从句的主谓之间,fine,修饰整个句子。注意要related to ACTION。
做题的时候有一个疑惑 viewing 到底是修饰financial experts 还是 policy makers? 这里其实不会有歧义 因为 viewing 在 that引导的宾语从句里,没道理跳过 policy makers 去修饰FE 再者,如果是修饰FE 句子应该是 FE, viewing the economyasXXXX, believe that policy makers XXXXX
view sth. as sth. 而view sth. to be sth.错误。
view sth. as sth. 而view sth. to be sth.错误。
view sth. as now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation,典型的独立现在分词结构作状语,在从句里修饰整个从句,这里可以把它作为原因状语,viewing与逻辑主语policy makers相一致。
view sth as 正确 be certain to 只能现在是,will be 错
view... to be 错误, be certain 只能现在时,are certain to
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习