逻辑 Critical Reasoning-12323

标记

Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage. Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones. Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?



【选项】The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

devayou 2015-12-12 14:35:04

try to diagram the argument, numbering each of the sentences and using the 'THEREFORE TEST' (try 'x, therefore y' and 'y, therefore x', and see which, if either, of them makes sense). 1 Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage. 2 Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones. 3 Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. 4 However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread . the structure of this argument is: 1 = background fact 2, therefore 3 however, 4 (which weakens conclusion 3) if you figure out that much, then it's clear that #3 is the CONCLUSION. (that's the single most important thing you can do on critical reasoning: figure out what's the conclusion.) since neither of the boldface portions is the conclusion, choice a and choice d are dead. (both of those claim that the second part is the conclusion.) now, analyze the boldface parts a little better: #2 (the first boldface) serves as a premise for #3 #4 (the second bold) serves as a counterpoint to #3, weakening the lasting value of the conclusion ...which is basically what choice c says. B) The first part is fine, but the second is not. The argument does not deny that the second boldface will be part of the outcome - rather, it says that the contrasting viewpoint is likely to overcome the main point of view.

0个赞

hydeying 2014-07-19 22:58:29

the structure of this argument is: 1 = background fact 2, therefore 3 however, 4 (which weakens conclusion 3) if you figure out that much, then it's clear that #3 is the CONCLUSION. (that's the single most important thing you can do on critical reasoning: figure out what's the conclusion.) since neither of the boldface portions is the conclusion, choice a and choice d are dead. (both of those claim that the second part is the conclusion.) now, analyze the boldface parts a little better: #2 (the first boldface) serves as a premise for #3 #4 (the second bold) serves as a counterpoint to #3, weakening the lasting value of the conclusion

0个赞

raymondilmlibra 2014-12-09 19:46:44

要把每个选项都分析透彻!!!!

0个赞

八毛Y 2016-11-29 20:39:05

weigh against---成为对...不利的证据

0个赞

huiminzi1124 2016-06-20 17:45:42

"prediction" means that the argument is predicting that something will happen. if there is a prediction, it MUST be the conclusion of the argument, unless it is being used as the basis for future predictions (which it probably won't). a claim is a statement that is not a fact, and requires an argument and/or supporting evidence. evidence is FACTUAL information that is used to support a claim. a consideration can be either a fact or a claim; it's used to support some other claim/conclusion.

0个赞

fishanne 2016-01-13 11:22:07

原文结构: 1 context 2 premise->3 conclusion (prediction) 4 counterpoint to 3 ( afterthought ) thus boldface 1 = 2 premise = development boldface 2 = 4 counterpoint of the conclusion=a consideration that weighs against that prediction boldface 1 & 2 are in two different sides!!!

0个赞

fishanne 2015-12-25 16:35:50

development = situation , prediction = is likely however => against .

0个赞

jdsha11 2015-08-16 22:29:27

注意关键用词however

0个赞

荔馨 2015-07-25 14:31:12

"prediction" means that the argument is predicting that something will happen. if there is a prediction, it MUST be the conclusion of the argument, unless it is being used as the basis for future predictions (which it probably won't). a claim is a statement that is not a fact, and requires an argument and/or supporting evidence. evidence is FACTUAL information that is used to support a claim. a consideration can be either a fact or a claim; it's used to support some other claim/conclusion. 第一句后面有thus,所以它是fact,后面的是结论。第二句即有since,也有conclusion,是对前一句结论的否定。

0个赞

alicesjy 2015-05-22 19:50:20

conclusion是thus后面的句子。有however不代表however前面的就不是conclusion

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们