Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
【选项】the current market for solar-power generators in the United States is very limited
美国太阳能市场目前是有限的。那么如果有限,funding的计划还能成功么?都没人买,产量还能维持原有水平么。必然不能 思维偏差:读选项的时候自己把选项扭曲成:原来美国太阳能的市场是有限的,那么说明美国太阳能在本国还有空间,还有发展的余地。 谁说市场有限说明的是有发展空间!!!自己脑子里就不该偷换概念!市场有限就是有限!只能说明市场是有限的。只要客观接收信息就好。
RON: here's something to keep in mind when you do these. if you're torn between two answers on Strengthen/Weaken, you should try to PICK THE ANSWER THAT'S MORE DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE SPECIFIC ELEMENTS OF THE PASSAGE'S LINE OF REASONING. in this case, here are the "specific elements" i'm talking about: this argument is designed to show that * american manufacturers will still maintain domestic market share, * even with the encroachment of the european manufacturers on the market. the problem with the choice you selected is that it has nothing to do with the latter of these two factors. in addition, as mentioned in my post above, if the american market is very small to start with, then this factor works against the argument (even if that small market grows so that it's ... not so small).
不要过度联想。现在有限,就算扩大也不知道量是否能弥补失去的欧洲市场
过度联想
过度联想
想太多了。。。如果现在的市场是limited,那么这个initiative不会使制造商维持产量,并不是我所想的因为市场还没完全开发,原文也没提到会开放Limited
错误构思:前提:demand increase 结论:maintain significant production levels 错误地以为随着demand的增长supply就应该随之增长,然而这里并不是说supply不变,而是说production依旧维持在高水平,不会因为demand的升高而减少production来获取higher price,在市场中行程monopoly
Since the market share is small, the demand is not enough
该选项说反了,market非常小,那么就算再怎么努力市场就这么大,不会有变化。
不要过度联想。现在有限,就算扩大也不知道量是否能弥补失去的欧洲市场?
limited=有限,不足以支持市场发展!理解字面意思!!
Ro关于E的解释:直截了当,limited意思就是没有机会,而不是潜力巨大; (e) WEAKENS the argument - if the u.s. market is very small, then it's likely that the production/revenue/etc of u.s. firms will decline rather than stay constant. 不能主观臆测
Ro关于E的解释:直截了当,limited意思就是没有机会,而不是潜力巨大; (e) WEAKENS the argument - if the u.s. market is very small, then it's likely that the production/revenue/etc of u.s. firms will decline rather than stay constant.
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习