逻辑 Critical Reasoning-11978

标记
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

Twenty percent of the stores in Morganville's downtown shopping district will fail within five years because they will be competing directly with the SaveMart discount department store newly opened in East Morganville. The downtown shopping district has lost business at this rate before and has always completely rebounded. Confidence that it will rebound again from the losses it is now about to suffer is ill founded, however, because __________.

【选项】when the downtown shopping district has rebounded before, the business premises of a failed business were typically taken over by a business of the same kind as had been there before

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

2个赞

ian709 2014-06-17 12:40:09

C实际上是加强,我的思路是模仿OG107,案例类似,讲的是downtown shopping rebound是因为non-discount store开了以后,倒掉的店被discount store取代了,所以M中倒掉的店不会再兴起,因为dissimilairty.这里如果选C,那么意味着M区会rebound.

0个赞

valora0909 2014-10-13 00:18:46

结论:能变好是没有依据的,因为_____ C提到了过去例子,想指出不能类比,但是题目并没说当前的是否是不同商业模式,所以指出之前是相同商业模式的替代,可以解释,但是有个gap,就是现在的变化是商业模式的升级而不是简单的替换。

0个赞

Jessicajy 2015-06-22 10:59:22

之前發生rebound的時候倒的店都是被同類型的商店取代 →這不會因此造成以後不會rebound,只說了rebound是甚麼情況 誤解成之前造成倒店的店和被倒的店是同類型 →自己又推說同類商店能夠共同競爭所以倒了再開是可能的

0个赞

jandrea 2016-11-22 10:06:41

选项说预测downtown会loss business但是很快又会反弹回来,像以前一样,这个预测错误, 因为什么? 这个选项说之前反弹的地区,失败的企业都是被同类取代,无关解释

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-12-22 03:37:59

在downtown shopping district反弹前,失败的企业被相同类型的企业管理,无关,杀

0个赞

sc60434 2014-07-17 09:52:33

之前發生rebound的時候倒的店都是被同類型的商店取代 →這不會因此造成以後不會rebound,只說了rebound是甚麼情況 誤解成之前造成倒店的店和被倒的店是同類型 →自己又推說同類商店能夠共同競爭所以倒了再開是可能的

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们