Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else.
语法 Sentence Correction-130
标记
正确的用户笔记
YolandaVanilla 2015-06-18 11:47:43
which可以跳跃指代前面的letters,因为which前面的名词Dickinson是人，人只能用who指代，而which只能指代事物(which不能指代人）而离which最近的事物就是letters,所以which指代letters
ethansue 2016-08-05 07:26:38
【, V-ing】小结： A)逻辑主语=句子主语，此时表伴随动作 B)逻辑主语=主句全句，此时表结果状语 C)前方为主系表结构，不表伴随、不表结果，只是对前句的补充说明 outnumbering her letters to anyone else中的outnumber不是与谓语动词were wirtten同时发生的动作 所以不是第一种情况，也不是表示整个句子的结果。所以不能用分词形式放在句尾。 出现了时间断层，不能 2）which可以跳跃指代前面的letters,因为which前面的名词Dickinson是人，人只能用who指代，而which只能指代事物(which不能指代人）而离which最近的事物就是letters,所以which指代letters
Lionot 2015-08-30 20:00:13
排除法解题思路：1、先把有插入语的答案去掉插入语后看看通不通顺，可发现 D错，E可能对－－－2、原句的重点应该是在后面，想说后面的那句话。所以可以杀掉：A,B,C;----------------------------------------------------------------语法解题思路：A：outnumbering伴随壮语，表示后面的事与前面同时发生，错。－－－－B：begin和end形式不并列； outnumber没有主语，错；－－－C：begin和end形式不并列；出现两个and错误的并列形式；再说整句意思上outnumber和end不需要并列，错误；－－D：造成outnumber与end错误的并列； 而且前句没有谓语了；错
鱼虫 2016-10-14 05:03:19
which ==> letters
Zee5284 2016-10-05 06:31:05
***剩余AE分析 不是所有的句子都可以用“SVO逗号+doing”的形式结尾。这个结构一定要保证doing和前面的V有因果和伴随。 A选项中，outnumbering和were written没有任何的因果和伴随关系，不是边写边超过，或者因为写所以超过。 E从语义重心来说，也更合理。不是强调信的起止时间。
meiyouyhm 2016-09-20 21:22:20
做的时候认为which指代七一，确实which就近指代前面的N., 但是SUSAN是人，which指代不了，所以指代的还是letters
feizhutou 2016-09-18 11:23:02
beginning ...ending 平行， outnumber 作为main verb 不能以其他形式出现因为会变成分词状语；而在这里outnumber作为分词状语表示结果或者伴随都不对 在这里可以使用 which可以跳跃指代前面的letters, 因为which前面的名词Dickinson是人，人只能用who指代，而which只能指代事物 离which最近的事物就是letters, 所以which指代letters
Lottieeee 2016-08-12 13:42:00
if you have "X of Y, which..." then: * if Y works as the antecedent of "which", then "which" should stand for Y. * if Y doesn't work as the antecedent, but "X of Y" DOES work, then "which" can stand for "X of Y".
Lottieeee 2016-08-12 13:40:17
occasionally, when it is completely unambiguous, "which" can refer to a whole NOUN PHRASE that immediately precedes the comma. in this case, this noun phrase is "X's letters to Y". (note that this noun phrase, as a unit, does immediately precede the comma.) also, note the complete lack of grammatical ambiguity: "which" can't refer to dickinson, who is a person, and it's also followed by a plural verb. both of these pieces of evidence point to the noun phrase "X's letters to Y".
sunnycc225 2016-07-28 02:35:26
天了，which不指代人所以跳过看前面。。。 涨姿势。。
huiminzi1124 2016-05-12 11:27:21
which可以跳跃指代前面的letters,因为which前面的名词Dickinson是人，人只能用who指代，而which只能指代事物(which不能指代人）而离which最近的事物就是letters,所以which指代letters
anne_yu 2016-05-11 12:09:28
原文重点是数量比较，which指代letters。正确
