逻辑 Critical Reasoning-7609

标记
Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this state, that lawyers who advertise a specific service charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. It is also true that each time restrictions on the advertising of legal services have been eliminated, the number of lawyers advertising their services has increased and legal costs to consumers have declined in consequence. However, eliminating the state requirement that legal advertisements must specify fees for specific services would almost certainly increase rather than further reduce consumer's legal costs. Lawyers would no longer have an incentive to lower their fees when they begin advertising and if no longer required to specify fee arrangements, many lawyers who now advertise would increase their fees.

In the consumer advocate's argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

【选项】The first is evidence that the consumer advocate offers in support of a certain prediction; the second is that prediction.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

Hellosaaama 2016-10-23 16:18:20

不是prediction,是事实:之前每次限制取消,就会有更多的律师开始做广告,费用就会下降

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们