逻辑 Critical Reasoning-7607

标记
Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this state, that lawyers who advertise a specific service charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. It is also true that each time restrictions on the advertising of legal services have been eliminated, the number of lawyers advertising their services has increased and legal costs to consumers have declined in consequence. However, eliminating the state requirement that legal advertisements must specify fees for specific services would almost certainly increase rather than further reduce consumer's legal costs. Lawyers would no longer have an incentive to lower their fees when they begin advertising and if no longer required to specify fee arrangements, many lawyers who now advertise would increase their fees.

In the consumer advocate's argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

【选项】The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate argues will be repeated in the case at issue; the second acknowledges a circumstance in which that pattern would not hold.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

libeili 2015-10-19 14:04:16

第一个黑体的情况是 明码标价的时候。。。在后面情况里明明标记被取消了,因此第一个情况的预测不会出现。第二个黑体不是承认,,是解释。。。

0个赞

yxu100 2015-09-26 12:17:02

Choice B is incorrect, since although the first boldface portion presents a pattern of cause and effect, the advocate’s prediction is that in this case that pattern will not hold. Thus the role of the first boldface portion is incorrectly described.看到选项中关于第一个的方向问题,有肯定和否定两种说法。首先要能刊出来第二部分是一个中间结论,或者说consideration(中间结论的同义词)。第二个的把握比较重要。第一个,如果以后遇到case at issue,就看和文章主结论是否一致。如果不一致,就是反对型。

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们