逻辑 Critical Reasoning-7014

标记
Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do. Since, even after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future, any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treated for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument above?

【选项】People who hold safety-sensitive jobs are subject to stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have, including drinking problems.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

1个赞

christinasysu 2016-07-31 12:42:48

加强

0个赞

onlyjx 2016-07-24 20:08:25

这个答案是想错了方向,如果题目说的是酗酒问题造成了工伤增加,那么这个选项可能削弱了结论,是反向因果,但是文中的主要结论是降低工伤,所以不论是不是反向因果,都会造成工伤增加,所以都要辞掉。

0个赞

shisu0610041 2016-08-30 16:54:32

如果题目说的是酗酒问题造成了工伤增加,那么这个选项可能削弱了结论,是反向因果,但是文中的主要结论是降低工伤,所以不论是不是反向因果,都会造成工伤增加,所以都要辞掉。

0个赞

onlyjx 2016-07-21 15:55:04

这个答案刚开始的理解是因果倒置削弱选项,但是实际上答案说的是恶化,所以说这些本来就有问题,所以一定程度算事加强项,所以不招这样的工人可以防止这种恶化和事故。

0个赞

danislj1227126 2016-03-18 23:37:27

此处因果倒置没有用,并不能削弱文中的结论。

0个赞

Cherry00721 2014-06-24 15:52:04

D试图用因果倒置来反驳不是酗酒导致事故,而是事故的高危性质引起的酗酒。但是D表达的不严密,D选项说高危工作的压力can exacerbate any personal problems they may have。exacerbate是加重的意思,其意表达那些本来就有酗酒毛病的人,会被高危工作压力加重,与原文需要的高危工作压力导致酗酒的事实有discrepancy。所以D选项是错的。

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们