逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6982

标记
Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as a treatment for the common cold, research has revealed no consistent effect. Recently, however, a zinc gel applied nasally has been shown to greatly reduce the duration of colds. Since the gel contains zinc in the same form and concentration as the lozenges, the greater effectiveness of the gel must be due to the fact that cold viruses tend to concentrate in the nose, not the mouth.

In order to evaluate the argument, it would be most helpful to determine which of the following?

【选项】Whether there are remedies that do not contain zinc but that, when taken orally, can reduce the duration of colds

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

sophiayao 2015-08-17 10:00:22

A 针对其他病情治疗效果无关判断病毒的位置 B 有没有其他无Zn的方法可以口服治疗感冒。TEST:如果有,说明病毒在嘴里。如果没有,不能说明病毒一定不在嘴里 C 是否缺锌无关,讨论的是病毒位置,因为两个方案都有Zn D 这两种方案是否包含影响Zn活性的成分,TEST:如果包含了,那么是不同成分影响治疗效果而不是病毒位置不同(两个方案不一样了,病毒位置不同的变量被破坏了);如果不包含,那么这两者完全一样,就只能说明是因为病毒位置不同了。所以说很好的evaluate了结论 E 单方面讨论gel是否对病毒的症状和时常有影响,并不能评价病毒位置

0个赞

lovelylucia 2016-09-12 21:59:52

无关比较,本身都含锌

0个赞

yiran32069 2015-09-17 21:35:08

文章通篇都在说zinc

0个赞

Hellosaaama 2016-10-31 17:57:39

其他不含有锌的口服药也会达到同样的效果(gel的效果) =>无关因素。不能判断gel是不是比lozenge更有效

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们