逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6247

标记
The traditional treatment of strep infections has been a seven-day course of antibiotics, either penicillin or erythromycin. However, since many patients stop taking those drugs within three days, reinfection is common in cases where those drugs are prescribed. A new antibiotic requires only a three-day course of treatment. Therefore, reinfection will probably be less common in cases where the new antibiotic is prescribed than in cases where either penicillin or erythromycin is prescribed.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

【选项】A course of treatment with the new antibiotic costs about the same as a course of treatment with either penicillin or erythromycin.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-12-19 23:02:38

新药花费与P或E相同, 无关,杀

0个赞

停不下来的雕兄 2016-12-22 17:34:28

钱是无关项

0个赞

jino_lx6 2015-08-13 23:58:30

没提到钱

0个赞

hoshinonana 2016-12-04 10:32:11

P:这么一个antib,p或e,7天好,人用3天,会反弹,换一个新的antib,3天好 C:用新的反弹减少 条件论证 花费和结论无关

0个赞

严龙伐虎 2016-01-07 15:48:19

无关选项,因为结论只说开两种药方的前提下的效果对比,而并未比较成本。

0个赞

jino_lx6 2015-08-14 00:00:07

说的是用了新药之后的less common.比价钱无意义,除非argument是说有了新药后less common这个能加强,因为若这儿贵人们不会买,则不会影响太多

0个赞

JellyC 2014-08-07 19:08:45

说cost一样等于在给两个方法加共同点,这不会strengthen的。现在就想说新方法比老方法好,再加共同点对strengthen是不会有帮助的。

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们