逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6206

标记
Brochure: Help conserve our city's water supply. By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use. A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.

Criticism: For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner's yearly water bills.

Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?

【选项】Even homeowners whose yards do not have water-conserving landscapes can conserve water by installing water-saving devices in their homes.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

1个赞

ClaireXu 2015-10-27 22:26:26

因为conversion只会save不到20元----节水yard的saving不能补偿转换的价格 即使没有节水yard的人家也能通过安装节水装置节水,跟结论无关

0个赞

2015-04-03 19:25:06

反向

0个赞

王eee_q 2014-07-23 01:23:08

看清问题问:削弱criticism的观点 A加强criticism

0个赞

Echosc 2017-03-27 20:23:48

无关

0个赞

肚子饿了 2017-01-01 14:01:58

没有蓄水的院子也可以通过蓄水装置来蓄水,这和反对者的点没有关系。

0个赞

Zee5284 2016-10-25 16:55:54

文章说反对C的,就是支持B。C说没有经济利益,反对C的话,选项要选有经济利益。
这个选项起不到说明有经济利益的削弱或强调的结果,说的是有另外一种方法。
如果是手段目的,说C反对B这个方案,问支持C,反对B,且问的是plan的话,可以选择。

0个赞

gloria熊 2015-08-03 15:58:11

看清题干 问的是basis for rebuttal,即要去反驳批评家,既要支持新的landscape是好的-A是说即使不换新的也能通过其他方式省水-没有支持新的,杀

0个赞

daoba992003 2015-06-25 01:37:39

没说到点子上

0个赞

JennyFeng1987 2015-05-31 23:35:18

A是加强

0个赞

summer遇见更好的自己 2014-08-11 17:17:01

文中讨论的是能否省钱,选项无关

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们