逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6176

标记
Over the past five years, the price gap between name-brand cereals and less expensive store-brand cereals has become so wide that consumers have been switching increasingly to store brands despite the name brands' reputation for better quality. To attract these consumers back, several manufacturers of name-brand cereals plan to narrow the price gap between their cereals and store brands to less than what it was five years ago.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the likelihood that the manufacturers' plan will succeed in attracting back a large percentage of consumers who have switched to store brands?

【选项】There is no significant difference among manufacturers of name-brand cereals in the prices they charge for their products.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

shisu0610041 2016-07-28 13:14:45

仔细读题,这里只说了name-brand 之间是没有差异的,并不是说namebrand 和store brand 之间没差别

0个赞

Echosc 2017-03-27 22:46:11

gap:质量能不能吸引回来顾客 A无关比较

0个赞

Zee5284 2016-10-27 16:33:40

有牌子的产品很难降价了。。。
自行脑补了商家要考虑利润等,所以不能盈利,plan就实行不了。
原文的目的时吸引原来的客户,所以能降多少能不能盈利不是需要考虑的问题。也就是说不管商家能否盈利,不会影响商家的plan继续实施。

0个赞

Zee5284 2016-10-27 16:37:40

纠正:是plan实现goal,原文的目的时吸引原来的客户,所以能降多少能不能盈利不是需要考虑的问题。也就是说不管商家能否盈利,不能影响goal使用降价还是有吸引买商店牌子的顾客回来买名牌产品。

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们