逻辑 Critical Reasoning-5144

标记
Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false fire alarms are prank calls made anonymously from fire alarm boxes on street corners. Since virtually everyone has access to a private telephone, these alarm boxes have outlived their usefulness. Therefore, we propose to remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the number of prank calls without hampering people's ability to report a fire.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the proposal, if carried out, will have the announced effect?

【选项】Responding to false alarms signifi cantly reduces the fi re department’s capacity for responding to fi res.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

Leating 2014-10-04 08:14:08

capacity与减少误报没有关系,文章的proposal的目的是,减少 the number of prank calls.

0个赞

Oooohhh 2016-09-23 18:21:23

错误,无关选项

0个赞

fishanne 2016-01-12 19:30:59

无关: 与plan无关,且不影响结果

0个赞

sasazz 2016-09-28 22:43:23

结论说的是这个方案“既能减少恶作剧电话,又能不损害人们报火警的能力”,这个选项只片面的强调了恶作剧电话带来的坏处,根本没说到这个方案的作用,也没说它会不会损害人们报火警的能力。

0个赞

senyu110 2016-09-28 21:07:00

看主题,选项在说对火警部门能力的影响,更像是移除警报盒子的作用

0个赞

devayou 2015-11-27 21:07:34

文中问为什么proposal可以减少假警报,而D是说假警报的坏处,并不能解释

0个赞

interesting 2015-06-07 10:35:21

强调的是报告火灾的能力而非报告火灾

0个赞

WickyGmat 2014-08-05 16:31:30

这个选项更像是移除alarms的作用,但是并不会因为接骚扰电话影响火警对火灾的反应而推导出移除盒子会减少骚扰电话或没有影响人们报警【一定要把逻辑链理清楚,然后把正确答案放在逻辑链里面在脑海里默默理一遍】

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们