逻辑 Critical Reasoning-4849

标记
Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern, non-forager societies.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists’ strategy?

【选项】Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

FreyaDoubles 2016-03-27 12:07:17

许多人类学家基于他们研究下,并没有从现代社会的研究举一反三古代社会 仔细想来是加强了对人类学家的批判

0个赞

flyingsophie 2016-02-27 18:01:19

這是support

0个赞

愤怒的小飞机 2015-12-06 22:10:36

加强选项

0个赞

Echosc 2017-03-19 17:18:19

无关类比

0个赞

cherrywyr 2016-11-14 18:45:25

很多研究modern-day社会的不参考ancient,但是和研究ancient参考现代的无关

0个赞

Oooohhh 2016-09-09 21:55:13

不能满足提问support strategy,不选

0个赞

IS777 2015-05-01 17:01:06

Question: Weaken the criticism that is there are non-forager societies for anthropologists to study Premise: A flaw that forager societies are varied A, all forager societies have common. Common opposite varied means weak B, Most? Can drawn any conclusion from most of amount? This answer is not sufficient. We can cross it out from the first word. C, modern society out of scope so cross it out

0个赞

愤怒的兔子 2015-03-25 02:08:30

许多人类学家基于他们研究下,并没有从现代社会的研究举一反三古代社会,这个削弱不了原文对人类学家批评的观点。

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们