from Manhattan Forum: 1. In E extinction is modified by prepositional phrase ( looks as if extinction has numbers five times greater) 2. In E numbers is absolute having no reference backward i.e whose numbers . It should be "its number implying gyrfalcon's numbers" 忘记了modifiers都是有就近原则的, automatically modify the closest possible noun.
ew
OG上的解答:Choices D and E wrongly use a phrase introduced by now with to modify The gyrfalcon. In both choices, the phrase confusingly seems to parallel with extinction; a new clause with a present tense verb is needed to state what the gyrfalcon's numbers are now.
E. now with引导的部分错误修饰主语the gyrfalcon;此外,由于前句有with extinction,此处使用now with结构,容易是人产生该结构与with extinction 平行的疑惑,故不妥
E. now with引导的部分错误修饰主语the gyrfalcon;此外,由于前句有with extinction,此处使用now with结构,容易是人产生该结构与with extinction 平行的疑惑,故不妥
The comma introduces a confusing phrase seemingly to modify "extinction".
now with 可以修饰extinction 造成歧义
now with引导的部分错误修饰主语the gyrfalcon;此外,由于前句有with extinction,此处使用now with结构,容易是人产生该结构与with extinction 平行的疑惑,故不妥
未划线部分有with结构,划线部分再用一个with结构有平行的歧义
number应该是修饰gyrfalcon的,但用在这容易和with extincitin混淆,意思表达不清
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习