Those指代salaries,该选项比较对象对等;lag far behind by…符合英语语言习惯,是很好的用法;to一词体现出了差距拉大的这种趋势,这些都是该句的优点。但是,句子:A's salaries lag far behind B's salaries by almost $24,000 less. Less与lag behind语义重复
lag与后面的less重复
lag far behind……by 8000,是正确表达;加了less之后明显多余
如果要用less的话,应该是$8,000 “less” a year at the start of their careers to almost $24,000 less才对。
没注意到less 这是一个redundant
less与 lag far behind by语意重复
A's salaries lag far behind B's salaries by almost $24,000 less. Less与lag behind语义重复,by就是表示数额差。不需要less。
less和lag behind 重复
lag far behind和less重复,所以不应该出现less
A's salaries lag far behind B's salaries by almost $24,000 less. Less与lag behind语义重复
less和lag behind句意重复
Those指代salaries,该选项比较对象对等;lag far behind by…符合英语语言习惯,是很好的用法;to一词体现出了差距拉大的这种趋势,这些都是该句的优点。但是,句子:A's salaries lag far behind B's salaries by almost $24,000 less. Less与lag behind语义重复
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习