Ron 的解释: in choice b, 'when' doesn't refer to anything - there's no time period to which it could logically refer - and that's the main issue with choice b. (if you interpret it literally, as you must, then it implies that (1) sometimes the vantage point was combined with the writing and sometimes it wasn't, and (2) it only made her valuable when it was combined with the writing talent. that doesn't make sense.)
可改成 a vantage point that, when combined with her talent for writing,made her...
the noun modifier 'a vantage point' can stand for the entire concept of at or near the center of political events from 1765 to 1789. B项, 'when' doesn't refer to anything - there's no time period to which it could logically refer - and that's the main issue with choice b. (if you interpret it literally,then it implies that (1) sometimes the vantage point was combined with the writing and sometimes it wasn't, and (2) it only made her valuable when it was combined with the writing talent. that doesn't make sense.)
actually, in choice b, 'when' doesn't refer to anything - there's no time period to which it could logically refer - and that's the main issue with choice b. (if you interpret it literally, as you must, then it implies that (1) sometimes the vantage point was combined with the writing and sometimes it wasn't, and (2) it only made her valuable when it was combined with the writing talent. that doesn't make sense.)
actually, in choice b, 'when' doesn't refer to anything - there's no time period to which it could logically refer - and that's the main issue with choice b. (if you interpret it literally, as you must, then it implies that (1) sometimes the vantage point was combined with the writing and sometimes it wasn't, and (2) it only made her valuable when it was combined with the writing talent. that doesn't make sense.)
actually, in choice b, 'when' doesn't refer to anything - there's no time period to which it could logically refer - and that's the main issue with choice b. (if you interpret it literally, as you must, then it implies that (1) sometimes the vantage point was combined with the writing and sometimes it wasn't, and (2) it only made her valuable when it was combined with the writing talent. that doesn't make sense.)
that可能指talent而不是 vantage point。且同位语vantage point前面却修饰时间,错
when从句之后需再接一个完整的主句
'when' doesn't refer to anything - there's no time period to which it could logically refer - and that's the main issue with choice b. (if you interpret it literally,then it implies that (1) sometimes the vantage point was combined with the writing and sometimes it wasn't, and (2) it only made her valuable when it was combined with the writing talent. that doesn't make sense.)
Manhattan论坛的解释是如果使用when,有两层意思 (1) sometimes the vantage point was combined with the writing and sometimes it wasn't (2) it only made her valuable when it was combined with the writing talent. that doesn't make sense.)
the noun modifier 'a vantage point' can stand for the entire concept of at or near the center of political events from 1765 to 1789. B项, 'when' doesn't refer to anything - there's no time period to which it could logically refer - and that's the main issue with choice b. (if you interpret it literally,then it implies that (1) sometimes the vantage point was combined with the writing and sometimes it wasn't, and (2) it only made her valuable when it was combined with the writing talent. that doesn't make sense.)
When从句在此句中使用错误,when引起的从句可以作为定语从句或者状语从句。作定语从句时,要求先行词是表示时间的词或词组;作状语从句要求有动作作为合理的修饰对象。when…应该置于that之后,改成 a vantage point that, when combined with her talent for writing,made her...
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习