1.growth是一个动作名词——考虑是否用动词会更加符合修辞和简洁原则,也是否更恰当的表达作者的意思 2.这里是the global economy自己和自己再时间上纵向的比较,前后比较双方都是自己,那么用一个代词that(new copy说明的是不同的事物)则违背了前后比较的是相同的事物时必须只能有it they then来指代这个事物的原则。 3.The growth of the global economy在这里如果可以用that 来指代,形式也应该是that of the global economy
from when用法错误,from介词后应该加名词; more后要有东西来形容growth的变化,比如faster
that指代中心词所以应该是that of the economy;同时是主语比较,所以growth is more than that of。。during10000years was少谓语动;同时from是介词不能加句子应该加名词或代词;from to严格平行,句子不能与名词平行
I believe this is correct. In fact, I think the usage of "more" without a following noun, adjective, or adverb will be highly suspicious in most circumstances. In other words, if you see something like "X is more than Y", versus alternatives such as "X is higher than Y" or "X is greater than Y", you should in general be able to trust the latter.
you can't use 'that' in this sort of construction, because constructions using 'that of' (or other preposition after 'that') must have EXACTLY parallel structures. in other words, if the second half says 'that during 10,000 years', then the preceding half must say 'the growth of ___ during something else' (or some other time preposition, such as before or after, in place of during).
that 后+of from when错误,应该为from 后面加名词
that 指代错误 from when 错误 from应该接名词
from when用法错误,from介词后应该加名词
rom when用法错误,from介词后应该加名词; more后要有东西来形容growth的变化,比如faster
1.growth是一个动作名词——考虑是否用动词会更加符合修辞和简洁原则,也是否更恰当的表达作者的意思 2.这里是the global economy自己和自己再时间上纵向的比较,前后比较双方都是自己,那么用一个代词that(new copy说明的是不同的事物)则违背了前后比较的是相同的事物时必须只能有it they then来指代这个事物的原则。 3.The growth of the global economy在这里如果可以用that 来指代,形式也应该是that of the global economy 4. from when用法错误
1.growth是一个动作名词——考虑是否用动词; 2. 前后比较双方都是自己必须只能有it they then来指代这个事物的原则; 3.The growth of the global economy在这里如果可以用that 来指代,形式也应该是that of the global economy; 4.同时from是介词不能加句子应该加名词或代词;from to严格平行,句子不能与名词平行
from when用法错误,from介词后应该加名词; more后要有东西来形容growth的变化,比如faster
growth的比较不准确,而且from to 结构只能填名词或名词性短语但是from when是错的
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习