RON:35 years since...指的是从African honeybees被released开始,到现在已经35年了,与原句意思不符合,且since应该加现在完成时,而不是过去完成时。
since+过去式!!! a也避免了逻辑主语文问题
choice c: 'the 35 years since' implies that the present is 35 years after the release date. not only does this conflict with the meaning of the original, but it also renders the past perfect (from the underlined part) inappropriate: you'd need present perfect in this case. also, since the release is a point event, it would belong in the simple past.
. The non-underlined portion contains “had migrated,” so the underlined portion must contain either a time marker or an action presented in the simple past tense. And here’s where our ear can be fooled. Many people will naturally think of the action as the release of the honeybees. First, they were released; later, they migrated. That’s certainly true, and if the sentence had used the verb form of the word “release,” then answer A would be wrong. But the word “release” is in noun form in the sentence. We don’t have any verbs in the simple past tense at all. Instead, we have a time marker.
后面未画线部分是had migrated,而C是had been released,都是过去完成时,意味着两个动作是同时发生的,根据句意,应该是先relase 然后才migrate。 但A选项里面,用了release的名词形式,很好的解决了这个问题
in less than some years since XXX
since要加时间点,不然语义不对。 the 35 years也不太好。
since是现在完成时的标志,与过去完成时不符
事件发生先后要有时态区分
since现在完成时,不应该用在这个句子里
since...had been ;与后面had migrated 错
since 加过去完成时是不对的
since是现在完成时的标志 暗示现在是35年后 和had migrated矛盾; since的使用不符合习惯用法
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习