Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the per year required previously.
语法 Sentence Correction-2664
标记
正确的用户笔记
songzy3411 2015-03-24 11:45:06
instead of后面the per year
ritarong 2015-03-18 00:01:19
nstead of正好对比了330美元
gabylu 2015-03-28 21:32:02
I'll assume "Scoetop" is meant to be Scoretop. :) "previously paying $7 per year" should refer to the students, which would make it a noun modifier, which is required to be placed next to the noun it modifies. It isn't. Incorrect. B) this time the phrase isn't even clear - "for which was previously paid" makes no sense C) "previously" is an adverb and should refer to a verb, but $7 is a noun - you'd need the adjective "previous" here. And really you'd want to say something like "compared to the previous requirement of $7 per year" D) I'm not a huge fan of this source. I assume the reason to eliminate this one is non-specification that the $7 per year required previously was specifically required for higher education. But I don't think the real test would make this the only distinction. They might also try to claim something's wrong with "instead of" (rather than "as opposed to" in answer E), but instead of can properly refer to a noun, as it does here... so it's fine. E) See above. Bottom line: I wouldn't study this one.
leemodest 2017-01-12 11:55:59
previously paying, paying现在分词
要考满分的晚琳儿 2016-10-25 16:57:12
contribute to/toward...
huiminzi1124 2016-05-28 12:21:30
文中核心意思是330和7的数字比较，所以 带有比较的插入语compare to 和instead of 是我们想要的，C里面 副词不能修饰 7，错
lxs19950206 2016-04-20 16:05:59
这题我做错。 逻辑： [修饰语]→previously 是副词，不可以直接修饰名词，C错误。 [语意不清]→E导致反对7块钱，语意错误； [介系词+关代]→后面要加上完整的句子，B删去； [指代不明确]→A的V-ing借代的句子不明确，如果借代前面整句，则语意怪异，不是前面的抗议或是其他的东西导致学费变贵，而是学生要付的钱变多。
Hygeia992 2016-04-05 14:12:01
contribute 一定要和to or toward 搭配。previously是adv. 不能修饰名词7
Ivycoco 2016-03-22 08:29:11
7 跟 330 对比
T100G700 2015-10-10 18:55:54
文中核心意思是330和7的数字比较，所以 带有比较的插入语compare to 和instead of 是我们想要的，C里面 副词不能修饰 7，错
isammi7 2015-09-15 20:52:47
previously是 adv.修饰verb。B，for which引导的从句缺少主语，另外330和the cost of无法比较
starjx 2015-08-27 16:40:12
7 可以跟 330 对比。不是instead of 就不好
