逻辑 Critical Reasoning-16619

标记
Using armored vehicles to detonate buried land mines entails an unavoidable risk of injury or fatality, but disarming and removing land mines manually currently entails an even greater such risk to those who remove land mines per mine removed. Therefore, in order to reduce the risk of injury or fatality without decelerating the effort to remove buried land mines, we must increase the use of armored vehicles and disarm fewer land mines by hand.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument above?

【选项】Land mines detonated by armored vehicles destabilize the land surrounding the mine, while land mines that are successfully disarmed manually cause no such damage.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

echo3104 2014-09-07 10:44:03

Choice D refers to land destabilization. Without knowing the relationship between land destabilization and the risk of injury, this choice does not affect the argument.

0个赞

Hellosaaama 2016-10-30 21:04:04

目标:减少伤亡的同时不能降低效率 方案:增加装甲车使用,减少人工 对比装甲车和人工对土地稳定性的影响,无关

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们