解这道题有三条思路,三条思路都不常见,是个难题。 思路1:语气 主句是豁然(would),所以条件也应该是未发生的状态,据此可以排除AB 思路 2:duplicated和duplication 后者更强调duplication本身,更符合题意,据此可以排除ABC 思路3:词语用方法 A的on the basis of noun. + noun.很不舒服,C的in that就没对过,D的while意思不明。 排除ACD 只剩下E。
句子要表达的意思为或然,而on the basis of表达已然的 意思
主句是would,所以条件也应该是未发生的状态,排除AB???
on the basis of A, B... 表示的是A已经被实现了,然后B在A的基础上被实现,所以放在这里就会表达已经avoided duplicated facilities 了,然后仍然继续build new hospitals 尽管这回造成waste resources
首先duplicated的重点改变了,以及on the basis of 指的是已经发生的事情而不是未来发生的事
应从句意了解,would表示虚拟,还未发生,但是 on the basis 是事实?
1.The problem with both A and B is that "of" after "on the basis/grounds" is introducing a very awckward phrase. however,The explanation (duplicate facilities should be avoided) is not just a "thing" but an action; a clause would be better than a phrase. In A & B, "avoidance of duplicated facilities" is very awckward. Get rid of them. 而且语气 主句是would,所以条件也应该是未发生的状态,据此可以排除AB。 2. the main issue discussed here is whether we should use "duplicated facilities" or "duplication of facilities". go back to the meaning of the sentence. "在B地建设很大的医院是浪费钱,(如果)只考虑重复建设的话。" so what we wanna avoid is the repeating action, not the facilities themselves, and consider of this point, D & E are better. 3." while" changes the meaning. it means two things happened together, so eliminate D.
if you say 'on the basis of x', that is usually taken as an acknowledgment that x has actually occurred. so choice a makes it sound as if building large new hospitals successfully avoids duplicating facilities. that's not true, of course: the thrust of the sentence is that the new hospitals are duplicates, and that's the problem. choice e correctly expresses the idea: the duplication of facilities is something to be avoided. the other message - that the new hospitals are guilty of such duplication - is implicit, but at least it isn't wrongly expressed (as in choice a).
on the basis of表示的是已经发生的事实
主句是would,所以条件也应该是未发生的状态,排除AB; 强调avoid duplication 而不是 facilities, 排除C; while 意思不明,排除E
1.The problem with both A and B is that "of" after "on the basis/grounds" is introducing a very awckward phrase. however,The explanation (duplicated facilities should be avoided) is not just a "thing" but an action; a clause would be better than a phrase. In A & B, "avoidance of duplicated facilities" is very awckward. Get rid of them.
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习