逻辑 Critical Reasoning-16092

标记
Environmentalist: The use of snowmobiles in the vast park north of Milville create sun acceptable levels of air pollution and should be banned.

Milville business spokesperson: Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville in winter months, to the great financial benefit of many local residents. So, economics dictate that we put up with the pollution.

Environmentalist: I disagree: A great many cross-country skiers are now kept from visiting Milville by the noise and pollution that snowmobiles generate.

Environmentalist responds to the business spokesperson by doing which of the following?

【选项】Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

1个赞 赞

floramimi 2014-07-04 18:05:59

分析清楚选项---challenge negative。。。意思是反驳一个assumption,这个assumption说好处被坏处超过啦,

1个赞 赞

lenka0monica 2014-07-27 11:05:51

an assumption that (certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome) 这里的assumption是负面效应超过正面效应,而environmentlist不是challenge这个,正好反了

0个赞 赞

你好我是豆沫君 2015-10-13 19:40:25

仔细读选项

0个赞 赞

Jesterleir 2016-12-26 15:39:43

注意这里是说environmentalist的观点,他Challenging an assumption,而这个assumption是Milville business spokesperson的观点,他认为好处被坏处outweighed,就是坏处比好处多,反了,文中发言人的观点是好处比坏处多

0个赞 赞

八毛Y 2016-12-04 19:37:17

当地人是否从snowmobile中获利是同一件事,而并符合句中说的既有好的结果,也伴随有一些negative aspects。

0个赞 赞

hoshinonana 2016-11-27 00:02:53

这里是被动。。。

0个赞 赞

啃GMAT7777 2016-10-12 21:42:34

商人说:好处很多 B: assumption是指: desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects 坏处多于好处了..... 说反了

0个赞 赞

不考到730誓不罢休的小星星 2016-10-08 21:47:19

outweighed by被超过 assumption:好处被坏处超过,即坏处多于好处 说反了

0个赞 赞

战斗乔 2016-09-12 14:58:30

outweigh V.比...更重要,这个选项就是说环境学家质疑了一个假设,这个假设就是那些设想的结果比这种结果带来的坏影响更重要,spokesperson并没有说设想的结果比坏影响更重要吧,他只说了能带来的好的影响,即设想的结果,并没有考虑这个结果是否会实现

0个赞 赞

shisu0610041 2016-07-30 18:18:27

注意这里是challenge ……negative,负负得正了;应该是“提出了”一个假设,而不是challenge

0个赞 赞

shisu0610041 2016-07-16 16:06:42

其实that后面接的内容是指assumption的,environmentalist是支持这个that后面的内容的,(虽然outweigh还有待商榷,因为原文并没有明确比较好处坏处哪个更大),但是这里说environmentalist challenging这个that后面的内容就肯定是反了。 所以环境学家是自己用了这样一个assumption,而不是去challenge它

0个赞 赞

shisu0610041 2016-07-16 16:06:41

其实that后面接的内容是指assumption的,environmentalist是支持这个that后面的内容的,(虽然outweigh还有待商榷,因为原文并没有明确比较好处坏处哪个更大),但是这里说environmentalist challenging这个that后面的内容就肯定是反了。 所以环境学家是自己用了这样一个assumption,而不是去challenge它

0个赞 赞

Mia11 2016-07-14 20:56:10

outweighed by... 是被动。。。 另外环境学家提出的也不是假设

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们