1.此选项中的"n.,+v.ing"有问题。一般",+v.ing"用于修饰前面的一整个句子,这里前面只有一个名词。 2.compared with...修饰的对象有歧义—有可能是Minivans,也有可能是carrying as many as....而选项A利用"and, compared with..."避开了这个歧义,使and前后的内容变成两个相互独立的内容,"compared with..."就只能修饰Minivans了。
however, there's a problem of semantics (meaning) with (d). the modifier "...carrying..." seems to signify that the latter traits are only true of minivans when those minivans are actually carrying the requisite number of passengers. if they aren't, then all of a sudden those things aren't true anymore. D can be kicked out because it is a comma + ing setup.... and comma + ing setup are supposed to modify entire clause choice (a) correctly uses the conjunction "and", which implies that both things are true but don't necessarily have to do with each other (i.e., the # of passengers is independent of the other claims).
however, there's a problem of semantics (meaning) with (d). the modifier "...carrying..." seems to signify that the latter traits are only true of minivans when those minivans are actually carrying the requisite number of passengers. if they aren't, then all of a sudden those things aren't true anymore.
夹心修饰S,M1,M2,VO。容易造成歧义,compared可以理解成修饰passengers
大平行小平行;绝对A,A的and并不重复,因为装7个人 这个动作并木有参加比较,所以这个动作不参与后面四个动词的平行,要另外隔开
there's a problem of semantics (meaning) with (d). the modifier "...carrying..." seems to signify that the latter traits are only true of minivans when those minivans are actually carrying the requisite number of passengers. if they aren't, then all of a sudden those things aren't true anymore. also,the " compared with most sport utility vehicles" modify the nearer "passengers" , but the original intention is to modify the "Minivans"
compared 修饰的对象不确定
-ing modifiers 与主句有紧密联系,但是这里capacity以及cost等是independent 的
M离谓语cost太远了
夹心修饰。因为2个修饰成分都是修饰主语,所以中间应该用and 链接
???ADE待分析
???待分析
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习