逻辑 Critical Reasoning-12274

标记

Astronomer: Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter's atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were. In hopes of gaining some indication of the fragments' size, astronomers studied spectrographic analyses of Jupiter's outer atmosphere. These analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur after the fragments' entry. The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but many astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter's outer atmosphere does contain sulfur. Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter's outer atmosphere without being burned up.

In the astronomer's argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?



【选项】The first provides evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that conclusion.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

寞小凉 2014-08-27 21:38:17

没有反对的意思

0个赞

love刘小宅 2016-02-21 19:08:10

against反对之意

0个赞

要拿第一名的神鱼 2017-01-20 16:34:15

the first part of this choice is correct, however, in the second part of this sentence,there is a mistake, 主要就是因为“weigh against"这个词错了,第二句话应该是support the conclusion而不是against!!!

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们