For protection from the summer sun, the Mojave lived in open-sided, flat-topped dwellings known as shades, with roofs of poles and arrowweed that are supported by posts set in a rectangle.
语法 Sentence Correction-1525
标记
正确的用户笔记
huyingchuan 2016-02-03 08:59:08
E的错误在于时态“are"和主句的”lived“不一致，语义上混乱. 如果E的选项如下则正确 with roofs of poles and arrowweed that were 时态不敏感的solution是在过去时态动词理解前价格"曾”,lived->曾居住在xxx
yjylain 2016-03-10 16:43:06
that 有歧义 是修饰 weed 还是roofs
siasiasia 2016-04-13 18:46:16
are时态错误；that修饰歧义
宋子一_ 2016-12-19 00:15:31
句义：为了保护自己不受夏日阳光的暴晒，M族人居住在开放式的，平顶式的遮阴住所，房梁上的的横杆和箭头杂草都被摆成矩形的竖标杆支撑着。 Ron： the main problem with (e) is the fact that "are" is in the present tense; that's illogical, considering that the mojave "lived" (past tense) in those homes. taken literally, then, this sentence is describing the current conditions of the houses, even though the mojave don't live in them anymore.
小揪揪 2016-12-08 21:36:42
与with roofs of poles and arrowweed to be 一样 roofs和arrowweed后面的that are从句有歧义，不明确修饰对象 凡是Aof B 形式的都要注意
ColdSheldon 2016-11-03 16:23:57
做题时感觉 comma+with 修饰preceding noun 这个用法本身没错 但是 the main problem with (e) is the fact that "are" is in the present tense; that's illogical, considering that the mojave "lived" (past tense) in those homes.
Hellosaaama 2016-10-24 16:43:01
open-sided, flat-topped dwellings描述的是侧边敞开的平顶式房屋，with roofs of...表达不符合逻辑
offer雨2016 2016-10-06 07:51:38
1.时态有问题，are 和lived时态不一致。 2.with前面有逗号，是修饰前面的整个句子，而不是前面的shades~each用于复数名词后面，用作独立主格，是进一步解释说明这个复数名词~
取个名字太麻烦 2016-10-01 12:00:50
are时态错误；that修饰歧义
yaomaczhang 2016-09-14 02:27:51
with，主语可能不对，with n +supported
不考到730誓不罢休的小星星 2016-09-13 20:40:00
are时态与前面的livied不符
在My9950213 2016-08-09 09:40:35
that are指代有歧义，既可修饰arrowweed，也有可能修饰roofs，另外时态也应为过去式
ocean09960802 2016-05-23 19:20:23
时态“are"和主句的”lived“不一致
