逻辑 Critical Reasoning-7395

标记
A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer's well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the lawsuit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singers' services cost more than those of their imitators.

The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?

【选项】The advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercials.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

gloria熊 2015-11-03 09:49:57

有题目理解的原因 题干说的其实就是:打击盗版-->成本上升的原理 E取非:这家公司不会再用知名的song rendition了-->不让用盗版,那正版我也不用了。削弱。 C一些原始的正版版本不在市面上流通-->自己YY为了“正版不能也通过低成本方式获得”的意思;

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-12-24 10:18:57

广告企业在商业中使用著名的歌曲,因为这样,所以广告费用的上升

0个赞

gloria熊 2015-11-05 11:04:24

盗版被禁止了-->广告费用一定会上升 潜台词是一定得用这个famous singer的歌,那有没有可能不用呢 E取非:不会再用 正解

0个赞

二黑要上7 2016-11-18 19:47:39

取反:广告公司不会用这些歌➡️成本就不会增加➡️削弱

0个赞

gjf1995315 2016-05-30 20:54:56

本选项是一个前提,如果广告公司都不用well-known歌的话cost也就不会增加了

0个赞

fishanne 2015-12-31 17:24:35

整个广告产业都用,所以这家公司也用,

0个赞

zyf0307 2015-11-13 09:27:36

reversal:the industry will stop using famous songs,if this is true, we have no use for the famous singers--therefore,we don't have to hire them---therefore, costs will not use---the argument is dead

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们