Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the director's rejection of the accusation?
【选项】The characters and plot twists that are most similar in the two films have close parallels in many earlier films of the same genre.
答案的核心集中在”Thieves is now accusing me of taking ideas from that film“这句话上,director为自己的辩护这是因为这句话而起的。所以问题的关键就是要讨论director是真的剽窃了thieves这部电影的idea还是因为其他的某些原因导致两部电影相似。这是一个比较典型的他因削弱objection,然后使得他因support main conclusion的题型(削弱反对=增强支持)。
A) Before thieves began production, its script had been circulating for several years among various film studio, including the studio that produced The Big Heist -W: This provides additional evidence that supports the ideas may have been stolen B) The characters and plot twists that are most similar in the two films have close parallels in many earlier films of the same genre -S: This provides evidence that similar characters and plot twists are simply a part of the genre rather than specific to the film THIEVES
gener这个很重要的单词不认识,致错 是流派意思,即这些相似的情节和这个流派的早期电影都有紧密的联系
【AB类比题➡️找有AB共同特点的C】两个电影很多一样➡️不是抄袭 是因为都和早期电影像➡️他因削弱
角色场景像➡️都是学习早期电影➡️他因➡️并不是抄袭
analogy: let's say you accuse me of stealing the tune of a song you wrote. but... if that tune is strikingly similar to the tune of, say, "happy birthday" (or any other famous song that lots of other people have also sung), then it certainly makes your accusation seem a lot less plausible.
因:角色剧情相似。果:指控抄袭。rejection:完成时间更早。 选项从他因表明,有一个更早的相似种类可能被两边学习证明指控不合理→ support rejection
他因削弱,从而支持导演的观点。
逻辑链: Film director: 我的新电影有一些情节和人物与去年上映的Thieves 相似,但这种控告是不合理的,因为我的电影在Thieves 上映之前就完成了 logical gap: 在Thieves上映之前完成不代表就没有抄袭的可能,需要提供其他论据来加强结论 如果这些相似的情节和人物在许多之前的这种genre(类型;体裁)的电影中出现了,那么表明该导演很有可能只是借鉴了之前的电影,而非抄袭Thieves.言外之意:两部电影都是借鉴之前的电影(其他因素)。
主要目的是反驳Thieves is now accusing me of taking ideas from that film这个观点,只要证明BH不是从T抄袭来的就可以,比如他们都受到了其它东西的影响
这是一个比较典型的他因削弱objection,然后使得他因support main conclusion的题型(削弱反对=增强支持)
该选项说的是B和T的相同之处,在之前同样类型的电影中也有。
把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习