逻辑 Critical Reasoning-7037

标记
In recent years, networks of fiber-optic cable have been replacing electrical wire for transmitting telecommunications signals. Signals running through fiber-optic cables deteriorate, and so the signals must be run through a piece of equipment called a regenerator before being transmitted farther. Light-Line is the leading manufacturer of signal regenerators. Therefore, Light-Line is one of the companies that will most benefit if new long-distance fiber-optic telecommunications networks are constructed.
Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the prediction about Light-Line's prospects?

【选项】Expanding its production of regenerators will require Light-Line to spend proportionately more on labor and materials.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

jeffvan 2016-06-04 19:53:12

只是简单的陈述了扩大generator的生产量,不能得出L-L公司所得到的benefit就会少

0个赞

小揪揪 2016-12-08 14:37:19

benefit 与 成本不是完全相关,不能作为绝对来选择 题目的实则意思就是:benefit=大量使用LL成功=有市场 而D····

0个赞

蛋蛋杀鸡 2016-11-16 22:04:24

原文的P:l是信号转换器的老大,由于政府要换光纤,需要很多信号转换器 C:公司将会盈利 该选项说了一句废话,会有成本

0个赞

稳定的玉米投手 2016-09-26 19:19:59

proportionately 问的是利润 利润= 销售-成本 按比例增加 利润也会增加的 并没有产生负面影响

0个赞

战斗乔 2016-08-10 22:42:19

一定要仔细看题,这个选项里有一个proportionately,就是说扩大r的生产将会相应的需要更多的劳动力和材料。这不是废话吗,产量大,劳动力和材料也要大啊。做题时看掉了proportionately

0个赞

yiyi11311 2016-08-10 16:23:53

并没有直接削弱benefit,成本增加,并没有说不会盈利增加

0个赞

陈艺蛋蛋蛋 2016-07-22 11:18:41

原文是proportionately的增加成本,说明对利润不会有影响

0个赞

danislj1227126 2016-03-22 16:08:10

成本大不代表利润就少。

0个赞

Cindygmat 2014-11-02 21:16:45

说的是扩大生产问题,无关,杀

0个赞

sh1rley 2014-09-12 10:39:18

只是简单的陈述了扩大generator的生产量,不能得出L-L公司所得到的benefit就会少。proportionately 也暗指并未超过

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们