逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6837

标记

In two months, the legal minimum wage in the country of Kirlandia will increase from five Kirlandic dollars(KD5.00) Per hour to KD5.50 per hour. Opponents of this increase have argued that the resulting rise in wages will drive the inflation rate up. In fact its impact on wages will probably be negligible, since only a very small proportion of all Kirfandic workers are currently receiving less than KD5.50 per hour.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?



【选项】Some firms in Kirlandia have paid workers considerably less than KD5.00 per hour, in violation of kirlandic employment regulations.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

1个赞

LancyXu 2016-05-21 21:08:05

既然是违反规定而给的少,那么提高或者降低最低工资标准都无效。所以跟讨论的点无关

0个赞

snow199511 2016-06-21 17:14:40

那又怎样?

0个赞

张2865 2017-09-30 12:35:15

我认为这个选项的错误在于:如果有公司违反规定 给员工只发五块钱以下的工资,那么不管这个最低工资限制怎么变,他们都还是会违法,不会因为限制提高而提高他们给工人的工资,从而不会致使整体工资水平提高而造成通胀。

0个赞

小揪揪 2016-12-18 09:57:05

some firm 这样做 但是 题目中已经说了小部分 所以some firm 小小部分 与题目意思不符:;题目意思是只提高最低工资 则说明在最低工资那部分人钱多了,别人没变,所以不会通货膨胀,但是c 则weaken

0个赞

愤怒的小飞机 2015-12-14 17:49:58

some力度不够,而且违反的现象在基本工资调高后也不一定会有改善,无关

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们