逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6818

标记

Often patients with ankle fractures that are stable, and thus do not require surgery, are given follow-up x-rays because their orthopedists are concerned about possibly having misjudged the stability of the fracture. When a number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?



【选项】X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

2个赞

JellyC 2014-08-09 02:36:01

这里were这个时态很重要,表示的是已经有很多别的医院的医师对这些病人进行过检查了,因此可以加强原文的argument即认为follow-up的x光没有必要且浪费钱。

2个赞

独角兽斯威特 2015-10-28 22:52:28

看题目,原文说踝关节骨折并且不需要surgery的病人通常会有一个X光的检测来看是否错误的检测而误认为他们是stable的,当review的时候,HOWEVER(注意转折连词),所有的review都表明这些案例一开始的诊断都是正确的,Therefore(注意因果连词)这个X光检测是个waste。求support。 看选项 A P医生比O医生更怎么怎么着,出现横向比较,杀。 B 许多ankle injury不是骨折,原文一直在讨论骨折的问题,出现横向比较,杀。 C 有点关系,留 D 恢复的时候check by x-ray,无关,杀。 E O医生order对骨折的X光检查而不是其他ankle的骨头,出现横向比较,杀。 回头看C,C表明以上的review是有代表性的,因此正确,此题正向来推也不好推,最好的办法就是杀错误的选项。 原文说“When a number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly”。 这个结论的得出是因为看过很多X光的follow-up,发现全都被治好了,那么前提就是“必须看过很多才能得出这样的结论”。如果才看过一两个而得出结论,那这样的结论没有说服力。 增强论据题型。 _________________________________________________________________ 本题两句话需要透彻理解才能做对:“When a number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly.” 这句话是说这个骨折病人后续做了一系列的X光检查,以确定其骨折情况是否稳定。“healed correctly”说明这个病人是在一个医生那里连续做了多次检查,隔一段时间做一次,直到其骨折完全愈合为止。这么做确实很浪费钱,浪费时间,因为医生没有信心啊,他不能肯定他的诊断是否正确,那么怎么办呢? C选项:“X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.” 这个病人在不同医院里由不同骨科医生做的X光检查都被分析了一遍。这个就好像很多医生一起会诊,如果某个医生一个人对其诊断没有信心,当看到那么多同行都做出相同的诊断时,他就应该放心了,没有必要做后续的检查了。如果有横向集体的智慧,就不需要纵向的长期检查,加强了论证。

0个赞

ChenVictor 2014-12-28 18:24:05

確認樣本代表性 support

0个赞

小揪揪 2016-12-18 11:58:43

增强论据型 when 那句话 这种特别注意 对某个论据的特别深入说明等 以及题目问的是加强argument 不是conclusion

0个赞

小揪揪 2016-12-08 15:41:42

已经被review了则不需要了

0个赞

啃GMAT7777 2016-10-12 12:06:00

” concerned about possibly having misjudged ” 病人对诊断结果不放心When a number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly.但事实结果是:没有出现misjudged。 如何加强??? ---------- C:病人在不同医院里由不同骨科医生做的X光检查都被分析了一遍。这个就好像很多医生一起会诊。样本其实是高度可信的,不需要每次来复诊。

0个赞

Kakamolo0808 2016-10-04 20:51:44

这些报告来源于不同医院里的不同的医生,因此提高了样本的代表性

0个赞

取个名字太麻烦 2016-10-03 11:27:53

表明以上的review是有代表性的,因此正确。排除其他错误选项。

0个赞

shisu0610041 2016-08-06 19:18:50

文章的结论是后续的X光检查是浪费钱,而原因是a number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly,问题也就出在这个原因上,谁告诉你a number of follow-up x-rays 的检验结果就是可信的,亦或是有代表性的?如果这些follow-up x-rays 全部出自于同一个医生之手,或者同一家医院,那是不是还有可能是这位医生的问题呢

0个赞

onlyjx 2016-07-17 18:19:23

又是一道神逻辑的题目,文中说明了一种现象,然后让你加强。答案的选项说的是这种情况在不同的几个医院都被检查了,说明这种情况不是这个医院独有的,扩大了样本就增加了代表性和说明力度。

0个赞

瑞雪兆丰年 2016-07-14 15:22:38

原文说“When a number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly”。 这个结论的得出是因为看过很多X光的follow-up,发现全都被治好了,那么前提就是“必须看过很多才能得出这样的结论”。如果才看过一两个而得出结论,那这样的结论没有说服力。

0个赞

Sherry彭 2016-07-13 18:59:42

这个选项虽然不是很明显的正确,但因为其他几个选项都有致命的缺点,所以再认真看看这个选项,其实也是可以把文中的内容架桥起来的。文中说很多接受X光的伤者反应blabla。。然后选项加强说,这些伤者是来自很多不同的医院,然后都反馈说X光没啥用,说明的确没啥用。。。

0个赞

LancyXu 2016-05-21 09:57:17

这道题的重点应该在misjudge上,即很多整形医生担心骨裂的稳定性是被误判的所以才需要照一大堆X光 但是如果按照选项中说的已经有不同医院的很多整形医生都review过了就不再有误判的危险,也就不用再照很多片子了

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们