逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6792

标记
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

The expansion of large-scale farming in Africa and Asia has destroyed much of the natural vegetation on which elephants have historically depended, forcing them to turn to cultivated land to satisfy their enormous appetites. As a result, farmers have lost millions of dollars worth of crops annually. Yet even if elephant sanctuaries were created on a widespread basis to guarantee elephants sufficient natural vegetation, the raiding would likely persist, since

【选项】Foraging elephants have been known to cause substantial damage even to plants that they do not eat.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

gloria熊 2015-11-06 14:40:05

如果说会有大的damage,那为什么自然植物被破坏之前没有damage呢? 这个要素一定是存在于变化之后的:即吃过crops后发现更好吃,所以习惯不往回变了

0个赞

金子0913 2016-07-25 00:09:53

此题问的不是plant they do not eat, 而是 persist 之前一直在做的的事情: satisfy their enormous appetites

0个赞

Lesley1010 2015-08-27 18:53:16

引:我觉得此题的重点是sanctuaries 这个词,这个词是保护区的意思,既然给大象了草料保护区,他们干嘛还要跑到农田去觅食呢,这就跟B选项矛盾了,只有他们爱吃农田的种植物时他们才会越过保护区跑去吃农田

0个赞

取个名字太麻烦 2016-10-03 11:11:48

the raiding would likely persist, 这里有个persist,就代表延续之前的动作,而大象之前是在吃庄稼的,所以它还会接着吃的,而不是破坏。

0个赞

shisu0610041 2016-08-05 23:48:50

即使大象在觅食的时候会破坏plants that they do not eat. 但是因为sanctuary很大,所以大象只会破坏它活动范围内的plants,对遥远的庄稼地没有影响。但是如果大象自己偏好庄稼地里的产物。那么大象就会有意识的来到庄稼地里觅食,这样对庄稼地还是有影响。所以相比较之下,D比B要好。

0个赞

yuki1995 2016-07-26 22:05:46

题目和大象是否damage无关?题目只提及大象的appetites, 和大象是否破坏plants无关。相比之下,大象更喜欢吃庄稼和appetite有关

0个赞

yuki1995 2016-07-26 22:05:44

题目和大象是否damage无关?题目只提及大象的appetites, 和大象是否破坏plants无关。相比之下,大象更喜欢吃庄稼和appetite有关

0个赞

jino_lx6 2015-08-11 21:18:59

have been known肯定错

0个赞

jino_lx6 2015-08-11 21:09:59

B错,argument提到是侵占到elephants的食物后才导致farm land破坏的,如果B对的话之前就破坏了

0个赞

ChenVictor 2014-12-28 18:20:58

out of scope 有沒有吃到東西和大象沒有農田沒有直接關係

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们