逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6440

标记
Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations requiring operators of surface mines to pay for the reclamation of mined-out land. Since then, reclamation technology has not improved. Yet, the average reclamation cost for a surface coal mine being reclaimed today is only four dollars per ton of coal that the mine produced, less than half what it cost to reclaim surface mines in the years immediately after the regulations took effect.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the drop in reclamation costs described?

【选项】As compared to twenty years ago, a greater percentage of the coal mined in Balzania today comes from surface mines.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

Simonelee 2014-12-10 15:41:35

煤的来源比例变化与地上煤的每吨成本无关

0个赞

战斗乔 2016-07-20 22:59:34

选项的意思就是地表采矿的产量更多了,但是单位成本会不会下降也不能确定啊,无关选项

0个赞

wong20gogogo 2015-08-20 16:29:19

讲coal的来源。

0个赞

khuntoria950817 2015-08-16 20:59:04

跟二十年前相比,今天更多的coal来自于表面矿场。无关。

0个赞

gloria熊 2015-05-13 15:34:07

表面煤的比例增多了,说明表面开发没变或者增加了--和题设矛盾

0个赞

Echo0416 2014-08-04 13:33:36

average cost for a surface coal mine:today<20年前 【能解释这一现象的肯定是造成cost降低的原因】如正确选项C:Mine operators have generally ceased surface mining in the mountainous areas of Balzania because reclamation costs per ton of coal produced are particularly high for mines in such areas. (放弃了平均开采成本高的地方)【AB比较,注意选项中的比较对象是不是题干里的两个 】题干里:surface mine 平均开采成本;而本项:说今天更多的煤来自surface mine(不影响average cost)

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们