逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6328

标记
Editorial:An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of evidence that the watch commanders enforce. The expert has therefore recommended that because the officers' time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted, the watch commander's approval no longer be required. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders' standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

【选项】The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial opposes; the second is a judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was used to support the proposal.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

1个赞

jino_lx6 2015-08-20 17:42:08

点错了答案而已,BF2是作者反对的,BF1是一个观察的现象,BF1.BF2共同支持了一个结论,(即本身都不是结论,BF1是现象,BF2是论据,)而作者反对这个结论

0个赞

稳定的玉米投手 2016-09-25 20:30:22

四对标签 E的观点: arrest mpo 可以被执行 直到被审批通过 (事实) 这种方法被否定如果 判断的不准确的话 政府的一个专家观察到 所有arrest事符合标准的(他人论据) 专家因此推荐 因为 officer时间花在批准上太浪费了(他人论据) 因此不要批准(他人观点) 两个论据递进关系 推出 观点 这种推荐应该被视为危险的(E的观点) 因为无法保证之后的标准会被观察到如果 不再用批准的话(E的论据) E反对expert

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们