逻辑 Critical Reasoning-6006

标记
During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company's total payouts on car-theft claims were larger than the company can afford to sustain. Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way. Therefore, Pro-Tect has decided to offer a discount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheft devices. Many policyholders will respond to the discount by installing antitheft devices, since the amount of the discount will within two years typically more than cover the cost of installation. Thus, because cars with antitheft devices are rarely stolen, Pro-Tect's plan is likely to reduce its annual payouts.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

【选项】The first rules out a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second presents the strategy that was adopted instead and whose effectiveness the argument assesses.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

1个赞

桃桃桃阿桃 2016-06-16 18:34:59

第一句讲的是不能reduce policies,所以该方案1不行。这是rule out a strategy,前半句判断正确;第二句讲这间公司决定采取的方案2,后面也的确 分析了其可行性,所以选项的描述完全正确!!

0个赞

Louise222 2015-05-25 14:00:57

rules out划去

0个赞

cocowu 2014-07-17 16:46:56

The argument is talking about two strategies to reduce the payout: 1st, by changing the car-theft policies, which is not possible 2nd, by encouraging policyholders to install anti-theft device Based on this the argument is giving the conclusion to opt for 2nd strategy. Please note, this is not the main conclusion. Rather the main conclusion is in the last line "Thus, because cars with antitheft devices are rarely stolen, Pro-Tect’s plan is likely to reduce its annual payouts."

0个赞

danislj1227126 2016-09-15 04:56:15

rule out:exclude rule in:include 第一句话提出的行不通的一个策略。第二个是行得通的策略,且后文都在评价此策略。

0个赞

眞白 2016-03-22 13:07:35

第一句话描述了一个可行策略:减少数量,但是PT做不到。 第二句话也描述了一个可行策略,并且PT做得到,采取了这个策略。

0个赞

rosereborn 2015-11-01 18:35:12

rule out是排除,反对,取消的意思

0个赞

Susie_yan 2015-10-12 10:11:27

前面的意思是:减少保险的内容

0个赞

libeili 2015-09-19 18:36:26

第一句:pro-tech 不可以减少cannot 。不能达到目标 第二句:采用另外一个方案来达到目标、 AE=E中结论不是第二句。因此A

0个赞

greatD 2015-09-10 20:51:03

第一句提出了什么事情不能干,是否认了一个strategy 第二句再提出一个方案,并且最后认为这个方案是评估可行的,完全符合原文意思

0个赞

荔馨 2015-06-09 21:55:46

行文架构如下: 情况:PT的保险支出太多; 方案1:减少保险的内容,被弊! 方案2:对安装防盗器的被保险人优惠; 原因:很多人对方案2反响强烈,方案2的方法使得车很少被偷; 结论:PT可以通过方案2达成目标 所以第一个BF是被弊的方案;第二个BF是被评估和采纳的方案 完善解答提问老师

0个赞

CyndiaLee 2014-12-15 14:03:09

P-T cannot [.....] , so cannot against CONTINUED large payouts THAT WAY. [.....]----- a way to achieve goal( against large payout)

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们