逻辑 Critical Reasoning-5999

标记
Which of the flowing most logically completes the argument?

The attribution of the choral work Lacrimae to the composer Pescard (1400 閳?1474) has been regarded as tentative, since it was based on a single treatise from the early 1500's that named Pescard as the composer. Recently, several musical treatises from the late 1500's have come to light, all of which name Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae. Unfortunately, these newly discovered treatises lend no support to the attribution of Lacrimae to Pescard, since _______.

【选项】the later treatises probably had no source for their attribution other than the earlier treatise

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

3个赞

崔宝宝 2016-06-11 09:44:38

这是一道统计枚举类型的题,文中说, several musical treatises from the late 1500's都认为P由L所做,所以推出结论:P归功于L。思考漏洞:1500‘s的treatises是否具有代表性?样本是否足够大? 于是答案D削弱:1500’s的treatises都是参照之前的(前提中的)treatise,所以并不具有代表性,削弱,不能证明P归功于L。

2个赞

jdsha11 2015-08-31 19:07:44

由题意可以得知,since后面应该与later treatises有关,但是ABC三个选项都是说明了early treatises,E选项1600,超越题目范围。所以选择D

2个赞

桃桃桃阿桃 2016-06-11 17:44:37

D选项:后期的几篇treatise文献很可能 只 有 early 1500s' 的那篇文献可以参考。就是说可能是抄之前那篇的...因此并不能说明Lacrimae的composer就一定是Pescard。重要的是读懂文章和每一个选项。

0个赞

lucyzc233 2016-12-01 06:30:20

choral adj.合唱的 treatise n.专著;专题论文 come to light 暴露;真想大白,众人皆知 attribuiton N 属性 composer n.作曲家 翻译:作曲家P的合唱文件L的属性被视为是暂定的,由于这个属性只是基于1500早期单单一篇专著(命名P是作曲家)。近日,一些来自于1500晚期的的文件曝光,所有的都说P是L的作曲家,不幸的是,这新心发现的文件对于L的属性的确定并没有作用 题目分析:解释题:矛盾

1个赞

lovehideto 2016-07-15 06:04:12

后面的文判定的来源除了前文就没别的了。所以自然起不了什么作用。

0个赞

Sparrow_7 2016-06-02 23:40:21

since 后面应该讲 newly discovered treatises 怎么样的,而A B C都是说early怎么样的,没说新发现的treatise,可以排除

0个赞

jeffvan 2016-05-15 19:44:08

原文说,later 1500's的MT出现,但是对于L归属P没有没有任何的帮助,那么选项的着重点就落在了later 1500's. ABC说的是early 1500, E说的是1600。杀

0个赞

jeffvan 2016-05-12 14:34:05

根据题意可知,since 后面应该讲 newly discovered treatises 怎么样的,而A B C都是说early怎么样的,没说新发现的treatise,可以排除,而E是1600s 超出范围,所以只有D了

0个赞

SophiaW 2016-04-26 07:47:17

只有在头脑清晰,选项原文都读懂的情况下,才算是真的能做出来;虽然很多题做的时候错了,再看的时候能做对,但那也说明当时做题的状态不行,不够灵活!

0个赞

yjylain 2016-03-17 16:19:32

根据题意可知,since 后面应该讲 newly discovered treatises 怎么样的,而A B C都是说early怎么样的,没说新发现的treatise,可以排除,而E是1600s 超出范围,所以只有D了

0个赞

Annie_Zhang 2015-10-21 14:02:15

The question is whether these newly discovered treatises lend additional support. Lacrimae has already been tentatively attributed to Pescard based on the text from the early 1500s. So, if the later treatises base their attribution solely on the earlier treatise, then they provide no additional support beyond that already provided by the earlier treatise.

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们