逻辑 Critical Reasoning-5901

标记
Astronomer: Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter's atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were. Nevertheless, some indication of their size can be inferred from spectrographic analyses of Jupiter's outer atmosphere. After the fragments' entry, these analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur. The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter's outer atmosphere does contain sulfur. Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter's outer atmosphere without being burned up.

In the astronomer's argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

【选项】The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the truth of that claim.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

大妹纸HJH700 2014-11-25 15:52:18

宇航员说:对s彗星与木星的撞击的观察表明,彗星在1994进入木星大气层之前已经破裂成碎片,但是他们并没有说明这个碎片有多大。虽然这样但是,有些对于这些碎片大小的信息额可以从对木星外大气层的分析中推测出来(在这些碎片进入之后,这些分析揭示了原来从未发现过的s)这些碎片本身并没有包含s,但是宇航员说,木星的外大气层下面的云层包含s,(因为如果彗星碎片渗透到云层中,s会渗入到外大气层)。所以,很有可能是这些碎片至少会足够大,使得他们能穿过木星的外太空而没有燃烧掉。

0个赞

T100G700 2015-09-13 21:22:08

A:a claim that he seeks to show is true. 指 【想要证明的结论】 B:意思是 反对上面结论的一个证据

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们