逻辑 Critical Reasoning-5232

标记
Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the mayor's conclusion?

【选项】Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city's schools to provide some nonessential services.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

1个赞

272491977 2014-01-11 16:06:16

since there are sufficient funds for the nonessential services, the school officials can still cuts expenditures without reducing funds for essentials services.

0个赞

gloria熊 2015-10-25 20:33:03

支持:学校能在费用减少的情况下继续不影响核心服务。 B学校现在还有钱来提供非核心服务-->有效加强; C:费用减少以来,非核心服务的成本没有上升-->无所谓,反正我要去减少,只要知道核心会不会受影响就够了。

0个赞

jeffvan 2016-05-23 08:59:31

说NONESSENTIAL SERVICES有充足的FUNDING,所以继续削减开支,还可以继续砍NONESSENTIAL SERVICES的开支,而不会影响ESSENTIAL SERVICES。 加强项

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们