逻辑 Critical Reasoning-5149

标记
Correctly measuring the productivity of service workers is complex. Consider, for example, postal workers: they are often said to be more productive if more letters are delivered per postal worker. But is this really true? What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?

The objection implied above to the productivity measure described is based on doubts about the truth of which of the following statements?

【选项】The quality of services rendered can appropriately be ignored in computing productivity.

选项是否正确?

  • 正确
  • 错误

正确的用户笔记

0个赞

elan0513 2015-09-25 03:24:10

这题很绕,但是objection和doubt负负得正,还是按照一般assumption的思路来做,即取反看是否削弱。注意要看是否削弱What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?这句话。这里明显是讨论质量与数量的问题,只关注数量就可以measure productivity吗?D取反,说质量不能被忽视,削弱。A和E取反也是削弱,但是没有一针见血,这里的要害就是“质量”!

0个赞

梦忆莜 2014-02-04 18:21:38

选项D没有看懂意思,考试的时候要注意看懂题目,这是道很简单的题目,要小心注意

0个赞

Charlotte0305 2015-07-06 14:23:09

这道题的问题题干比较绕:the objection is based on doubts 负负得正,就是在找前提 每邮递员送信越多,产能越高 反对:如果送信越多,丢的信也越多呢? 问: 反对该方法的论述是基于怀疑下列哪项事实。就是说,下列选项是支持measure的,是measure的primise. 反对看的是质量,不单纯是产能(送信量) D 服务质量可以在计算产量时被近似忽略。该选项是measure的primise.

0个赞

jeffvan 2016-05-22 12:01:16

原文说,delivered letter per worker -> determine productivity. 但是其他影响因素例如,lost or delayed letters per worker就不考虑在内么? 题目问,反对者基于什么反对这种衡量效率方法的。

0个赞

fishanne 2015-12-31 15:48:23

作者不同意

0个赞

T100G700 2015-09-15 19:29:18

没有认真读文题,问题很绕:上述【反对】 是基于对【哪条假设】的【怀疑】? →上述论断不同意哪一条?

0个赞

Shaw 2014-12-07 20:03:53

题目问的是关于the productivity measure described

GMAT

考满分GMAT备考平台-公开课天天看,免费提供强大的学习做题
系统,专业优质的在线课程助你迅速提分。

GMAT考满分App

把网站装进口袋
随时随地练习

联系我们